Omid Hossein Zadeh 1 * , Marzieh Hajjarian 2 , Mohammad Reza Abdi 3
Correspondence: o.hoseinzadeh@urmia.ac.ir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55976/dma.42026146760-86
Show More
[1]Reif JAM, Feldmeier CL, Georganta E, Kugler KG, Brodbeck FC. From ideation to implementation: A model of team innovation. Group Organization Management. 2025. doi:10.1177/10596011251334678.
[2]Permana AY, Wening N. The Influence of Groupthink and Bounded Rationality in Decision-Making on Public Policy. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies. 2024;4(3): 855-870. doi:10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1086.
[3]Tovmasyan G. How do psychological factors, cognitive biases and cognitive dissonance affect the work performance and decision making?. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2023;14(3): 26-36. doi:10.21272/mmi.2023.3-04.
[4]Wei X. Practical application of anchoring effect based on different mechanisms. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. 2023;14: 1-6. doi:10.54254/2754-1169/14/20230849.
[5]Hinsz VB, Robinson MD. A conceptualization of mood influences on group judgment and decision making: The key function of dominant cognitive processing strategies. Small Group Research. 2025;56(1): 71-113. doi:10.1177/10464964241274124.
[6]Lan J. Emotional influences on individual decisionmaking: A comprehensive literature review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 2024;49(1): 142-148. doi:10.54254/2753-7048/49/20231925.
[7]Forsyth DR. Group Dynamics. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2019.
[8]Chao AZ. Confirmation bias in decision-making: Implications in finance, business, and digital media. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management. 2024;45: 600-606. doi:10.54097/a9e6e764.
[9]Berthet V, Teovanović P, de Gardelle V. A common factor underlying individual differences in confirmation bias. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 27795. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78053-7.
[10]Pompian MM. Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management: How to Build Optimal Portfolios That Account for Investor Biases. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
[11]Schippers MC, Rus DC. Optimizing decision-making processes in times of COVID-19: using reflexivity to counteract information-processing failures. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12: 650525. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525.
[12]Mirbagheri SM, Rafiei Atani AO. Managers’ cognitive biases in decision making: revisiting an effective method. SAGE Open. 2025;15(3). doi: 10.1177/21582440251355330.
[13]Ferrara E. Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Science. 2024;6(1): 3. doi:10.3390/sci 6010003.
[14]Dörner D, Güss CD. PSI: A computational architecture of cognition, motivation, and emotion. Review of General Psychology. 2013;17(3): 297-317. doi:10.1037/a0032947.
[15]Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS. Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015;66: 799-823. doi:10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115043.
[16]Yang Q, Du P, Wang Y, Liang B. Developing a rough set based approach for group decision making based on determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Operational Research. 2018;18(3): 757-779. doi:10.1007/s12351-017-0344-3.
[17]Kunsch PL, Brans JP. Visualising multi-criteria weight elicitation by multiple stakeholders in complex decision systems. Operational Research. 2019;19(4): 955-971. doi:10.1007/s12351-018-00446-0.
[18]Zhong X, Cao J, Yi W, Du Z. Consensus reaching for large-scale group decision making: A gain-loss analysis perspective. Expert Systems with Applications. 2025;272: 126742. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126742.
[19]Wan SP, Zou WC, Dong JY, Gao Y. Dual strategies consensus reaching process for ranking consensus based probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making method. Expert Systems with Applications. 2025; 262: 125342. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125342.
[20]Newig J, Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E. Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change. 2023;82: 102705. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705.
[21]Balezentis T, Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Streimikiene D. Stakeholder involvement for sustainable energy development based on uncertain group decision-making: Prioritizing the renewable energy heating technologies and the BWM-WASPAS-IN approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021;73: 103114. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103114.
[22]Javalagi AA, Harris-Watson AM, DeChurch LA. Zooming in and zoning out: Remote deliberation impairs team decision quality. Group and Organization Management. 2023;49(5): 1071-1085. doi:10.1177/10596011231169590.
[23]Elster J. Securities Against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139382762.
[24]Overmans T, Grimmelikhuijsen S. Understanding microlevel budgeting behavior: How cognitive biases shape politicians' budget preferences. Governance. 2025;38: e70004. doi:10.1111/gove.70004.
[25]Solomon M. Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation and dissent. Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2006;44: 28-42. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x.
[26]Bolger F, Rowe G, Hamlin I, Belton I, Crawford MM, Sissons A, et al. Virtuous opinion changes in structured groups. Judgment and Decision Making. 2023;18: e25. doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.22.
[27]Bauer TD, Humphreys KA, Trotman KT. Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Research in the time of COVID-19 and beyond. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 2022;41(1): 3-23. doi:10.2308/AJPT-2020-147.
[28]Khan Z, Ambadekar S. AI-powered collective decision-making systems and the future trends. In: 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). Kamand, India: IEEE; 2024. p.1-10. doi:10.1109/ICCCNT61001.2024.10725853.
[29]Zhu R. The influence of cognitive bias on risk decision-making under uncertain conditions: A case study of 1986 Challenger. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 2023;18: 8-15. doi:10.54254/2753-7048/18/20231273.
[30]Fasolo B, Heard C, Scopelliti I. Mitigating cognitive bias to improve organizational decisions: An integrative review, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Management. 2025;51(6): 2182-2211. doi:10.1177/01492063241287188.
[31]Tran T, Felfernig A, Le VM. An overview of consensus models for group decision-making and group recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 2024; 34: 489-547. doi: 10.1007/s11257-023-09380-z.
[32]Alharbi M, Khalifa HA. Enhanced Fuzzy Delphi Method in Forecasting and Decision-Making. Advances in Fuzzy Systems. 2021;2021(1): 2459573. doi:10.1155/2021/2459573.
[33]Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Sangaiah AK. Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2018;9: 1427-1443. doi:10.1007/s12652-017-0548-7.
[34]Khan MR, Alam MJ, Tabassum N, Khan NA. A systematic review of the Delphi-AHP method in analyzing challenges to public-sector project procurement and the supply chain: a developing country’s perspective. Sustainability. 2022; 14(21): 14215. doi:10.3390/su142114215.
[35]Zhang X, Fan C, Zhang B, Guo Y, Dong S, Yang G. Delphi collaboration strategy for multiagent optical fiber intelligent health monitoring system. Journal of Sensors. 2022;2022(1): 5497708. doi:10.1155/2022/5497708.
[36]Bui T, Lim M, Sujanto RY, Ongkowidjaja M, Tseng M. Building a hierarchical sustainable consumption behavior model in qualitative information: Consumer behavior influences on social impacts and environmental responses. Sustainability. 2022;14(16): 9877. doi:10.3390/su14169877.
[37]Nyberg EP, Nicholson AE, Korb KB, Wybrow M, Zukerman I, Mascaro S, et al. BARD: A structured technique for group elicitation of Bayesian networks to support analytic reasoning. Risk Analysis. 2022;42(6): 1155-1178. doi:10.1111/risa.13759.
[38]Vahidinia A, Hasani A. A comprehensive evaluation model for smart supply chain based on the hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics. 2023;1(1): 219-237. doi:10.31181/jscda11202313.
[39]Biegacki ET, Tetrault JM, Fiellin D. Strategic planning for addiction programs within academic medical centers: Examples from the Yale Program in Addiction Medicine. Substance Abuse. 2022;43(1): 183-186. doi:10.1080/08897077.2022.2074606.
[40]Shashiashvili NSN. Use of the Delphi technique in pharmaceutical and health services research. Economics. 2024;106(11-12): 63-67. doi:10.36962/ecs106/11-12/2024-63.
[41]Guiller J, Alvim A, Martins V, Monteiro NA. Selection of a tool to decision making for site selection for high level waste. EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies. 2016;2: 6. doi:10.1051/epjn/e2015-50039-x.
[42]Dharanikota H, Howie E, Hope L, Wigmore SJ, Skipworth RJE, Yule S. Debiasing judgements using a distributed cognition approach: A scoping review of technological strategies. Human Factors. 2025;67(6): 525-545. doi:10.1177/00187208241292897.
[43]Zhang H, Dong Y, Chiclana F, Yu S. Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019;275(2): 580-598. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052.
[44]Susanty A, Tjahjono B, Sulistyani RE. An investigation into circular economy practices in the traditional wooden furniture industry. Production Planning & Control. 2020;31(16): 1336-1348. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1707322.
[45]Saaty TL. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications; 2001.
[46]Hossein Zadeh O, Hajjarian M, Abdi MR. Effect of stakeholders’ biased judgments on the result of the group decision making. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP 2022). Web Conference; 2022.doi:10.13033/isahp.y2022.031.
[47]Molina-Garrido M, Guillén-Ponce C, Blanco R, Saldaña J, Feliú J, Antonio M, et al. Delphi consensus of an expert committee in oncogeriatrics regarding comprehensive geriatric assessment in seniors with cancer in Spain. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2017;9(4): 337–345. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2017.11.012.
[48]Armuzzi A, Felice C, Lubrano E, Cantini F, Castiglione F, Gionchetti P, et al. Multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis: A Delphi consensus among Italian experts. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2017;49(12): 1298-1305. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2017.06.004.
Copyright © 2026 Omid Hossein Zadeh, Marzieh Hajjarian, Mohammad Reza Abdi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright licenses detail the rights for publication, distribution, and use of research. Open Access articles published by Luminescience do not require transfer of copyright, as the copyright remains with the author. In opting for open access, the author(s) should agree to publish the article under the CC BY license (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The CC BY license allows for maximum dissemination and re-use of open access materials and is preferred by many research funding bodies. Under this license, users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution, including for commercial purposes, providing they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

Luminescience press is based in Hong Kong with offices in Wuhan, China.
E-mail: publisher@luminescience.cn