Navya Velverthi 1 * , Victor Prybutok 2 , Gayle Prybutok 3 , Lingzi Hong 4
Correspondence: NavyaReddyVelverthi@my.unt.edu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55976/dma.12023119048-56
Show More
[1]U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. What is a patient portal? [Internet]. HealthIT.gov. 2017 Sep 29 [cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-patient-portal
[2]Hulter P, Pluut B, Leenen-Brinkhuis C, et al. Adopting patient portals in hospitals: qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(5):e16921. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16921
[3]Lafata JE, Miller CA, Shires DA, et al. Patients’ adoption of and feature access within electronic patient portals. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2018;24(11):e352.
[4]Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016;18(3):e5069. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5069
[5]Hoogenbosch B, Postma J, de Man-van Ginkel JM, et al. Use and the users of a patient portal: cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018;20(9):e262. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9418
[6]American Hospital Association. AHA Data products [Internet]. AHA. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.aha.org/data-insights/aha-data-products
[7]Patient Engagement HIT. Patient access to the health data portal access surges to 92% [Internet]. [cited date unknown]. Available from: https://patientengagementhit.com/news/patient-access-to-health-data-portal-access-surges-to-92
[8]Hong YA, Jiang S, Liu PL. Use of patient portals of electronic health records remains low from 2014 to 2018: results from a national survey and policy implications. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2020;34(6):677-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117119900591
[9]Nishii A, Campos-Castillo C, Anthony D. Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMIA Open. 2022;5(4):ooac104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac104
[10]Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. Individuals' Access and Use of Patient Portals and Smartphone Health Apps in 2020. HealthIT.gov. 2020. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/data/data-briefs/individuals-access-and-use-patient-portals-and-smartphone-health-apps-2020.
[11]Griffin A, Skinner A, Thornhill J, et al. Patient portals. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2016;07(02):489–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.4338/aci-2016-01-ra-0003.
[12]Clark SJ, Costello LE, Gebremariam A, et al. A national survey of parent perspectives on use of patient portals for their children’s health care. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2015;6(01):110-119. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0098.
[13]Chan B, Lyles C, Kaplan C, et al. A comparison of electronic patient-portal use among patients with resident and attending primary care providers. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2018; 33:2085-2091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4637-x
[14]Latulipe C, Gatto A, Nguyen HT, et al. Design considerations for patient portal adoption by low-income, older adults. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015. p. 3859-3868. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702392
[15]Luque AE, Van Keken A, Winters P, et al. Barriers and facilitators of online patient portals to personal health records among persons living with HIV: formative research. JMIR Research Protocols. 2013;2(1):e2302. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.2302
[16]Wright JA, Volkman JE, Leveille SG, et al. Predictors of Online Patient Portal Use Among a Diverse Sample of Emerging Adults: Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR Formative Research. 2022 Feb 15;6(2):e33356. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33356
[17]Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Exe NL, Witteman HO. Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients’ ability to identify out-of-range test results. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014;16(8):e3241. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3241
[18]Bowen ME, Henske JA, Potter A. Health care transition in adolescents and young adults with diabetes. Clinical Diabetes. 2010;28(3):99-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.28.3.99.
[19]Allende-Richter S, Ramirez M, Khoury Z, et al. Assessment of self-management skills toward transition readiness and patient portal use among Hispanic adolescent and young adult patients. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 2020; 4(1): e000658. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000658
[20]Betz CL, Lobo ML, Nehring WM, et al. Voices not heard: A systematic review of adolescents and emerging adults' perspectives of health care transition. Nursing Outlook. 2013;61(5):311-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2013.01.008
[21]Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Snyder PR, et al. Characterizing the transition from pediatric to adult care among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. 2013;30(5):610-615. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12067
[22]Majumder E, Cogen FR, Monaghan M. Self-management strategies in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2017;31(1):29-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.01.003
[23]Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, et al. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(2):e40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3703
[24]Powell K, Myers C. Electronic patient portals: patient and provider perceptions. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics. 2018;22(1).
[25]Harris MA, Freeman KA, Duke DC. Transitioning from pediatric to adult health care: dropping off the face of the earth. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2011;5(1):85-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827610378343
[26]Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health psychology. 2007;26(2):136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
[27]Deng Z, Liu S. Understanding consumer health information-seeking behavior from the perspective of the risk perception attitude framework and social support in mobile social media websites. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2017;105:98-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.014
[28]Dowling GR, Staelin R. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research. 1994;21(1):119-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
[29]Hubert M, Blut M, Brock C, et al. Acceptance of smartphone‐based mobile shopping: Mobile benefits, customer characteristics, perceived risks, and the impact of application context. Psychology & Marketing. 2017;34(2):175-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20982
[30]Nasir S, Yurder Y. Consumers’ and physicians’ perceptions about high-tech wearable health products. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 195:1261-1267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.279
[31]Belanche D, Guinalíu M, Albás P. Customer adoption of p2p mobile payment systems: The role of perceived risk. Telematics and Informatics. 2022; 72:101851. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101851
[32]Jacoby J, Kaplan LB. The components of perceived risk. ACR special volumes. 1972.
[33]Kaplan LB, Szybillo GJ, Jacoby J. Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1974;59(3):287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036657
[34]Featherman MS, Pavlou PA. Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2003;59(4):451-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
[35]Qi M, Cui J, Li X, et al. Perceived factors influencing the public intention to use e-consultation: analysis of web-based survey data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(1):e21834. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21834
[36]Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research. 2003;14(2):189-217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
[37]Sarstedt M, Hair Jr JF, Cheah JH, et al. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2019;27(3):197-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
[38]Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[39]Nunnally, J.C. An Overview of Psychological Measurement. In: Wolman, B.B. (eds) Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders. Springer, Boston, MA, 1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
[40]Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2015;43:115-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[41]Kock N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec). 2015;11(4):1-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
[42]Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88(3):588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[43]Hu LT, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods. 1998;3(4):424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
[44]Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2015; 43:115-135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[45]Arfi WB, Nasr IB, Khvatova T, et al. Understanding acceptance of eHealthcare by IoT natives and IoT immigrants: An integrated model of UTAUT, perceived risk, and financial cost. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; 163:120437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120437
[46]Chu D, Lessard D, Laymouna MA, et al. Understanding the risks and benefits of a patient portal configured for HIV care: patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022;12(2):314. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020314
[47]Medical Economics. Patient portals: Essential but underused by physicians. [Internet] 2015. Available from: https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/patient-portals-essential-underused-physicians
[48]Asan O, Carayon P. Human factors of health information technology—challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2017;33(4):255-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1282755
[49]Xie H, Prybutok G, Peng X, et al. Determinants of trust in health information technology: An empirical investigation in the context of an online clinic appointment system. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2020;36(12):1095-1109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1712061
[50]Zhang J, Luximon Y, Li Q. Seeking medical advice in mobile applications: How social cue design and privacy concerns influence trust and behavioral intention in impersonal patient–physician interactions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022; 130:107178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107178
Copyright © 2023 Navya Velverthi, Victor Prybutok, Gayle Prybutok, Lingzi Hong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright licenses detail the rights for publication, distribution, and use of research. Open Access articles published by Luminescience do not require transfer of copyright, as the copyright remains with the author. In opting for open access, the author(s) should agree to publish the article under the CC BY license (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The CC BY license allows for maximum dissemination and re-use of open access materials and is preferred by many research funding bodies. Under this license, users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution, including for commercial purposes, providing they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Luminescience press is based in Hong Kong with offices in Wuhan and Xi'an, China.
E-mail: publisher@luminescience.cn